<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (4) TMI 273 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180696</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the Division Bench&#039;s decision and directed the single Judge to handle the Second Appeal without being influenced by the Division Bench&#039;s findings. The single Judge was tasked with determining if any part of the property transferred to the appellant was unlawfully held by the respondents. The Court did not award costs for the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 16:01:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (4) TMI 273 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180696</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the Division Bench&#039;s decision and directed the single Judge to handle the Second Appeal without being influenced by the Division Bench&#039;s findings. The single Judge was tasked with determining if any part of the property transferred to the appellant was unlawfully held by the respondents. The Court did not award costs for the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180696</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>