<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 892 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180695</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, finding that the Full Bench of the Kerala High Court erred in deciding the revision petition on merits after answering the reference from the Division Bench. The Court held that the Full Bench should have remitted the matter back to the Division Bench for decision in accordance with legal principles. The revision petition was revived and directed to be disposed of by the Division Bench promptly. No costs were imposed in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:55:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=422000" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 892 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180695</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, finding that the Full Bench of the Kerala High Court erred in deciding the revision petition on merits after answering the reference from the Division Bench. The Court held that the Full Bench should have remitted the matter back to the Division Bench for decision in accordance with legal principles. The revision petition was revived and directed to be disposed of by the Division Bench promptly. No costs were imposed in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>