<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 1026 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180688</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the validity of the reassessment proceedings under section 147, allowing the addition under section 2(22)(a) of the Act for deemed dividend. However, the Court found the reassessment order invalid due to failure to timely provide reasons for reopening, leading to the assessment being set aside in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 14:11:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421990" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 1026 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180688</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the validity of the reassessment proceedings under section 147, allowing the addition under section 2(22)(a) of the Act for deemed dividend. However, the Court found the reassessment order invalid due to failure to timely provide reasons for reopening, leading to the assessment being set aside in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180688</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>