<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1070 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325886</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal challenging the Tribunal&#039;s order of dismissal based on limitation, citing that the subsequent right of appeal introduced in 2015 cannot retroactively create a substantive right to appeal against orders issued in 2008 when no statutory appeal remedy existed. The appellant&#039;s request for condonation of delay was denied, emphasizing that the right of appeal is a procedural matter that cannot be applied retrospectively to orders issued before the statutory remedy was available. The court found no substantial question of law and rejected the appellant&#039;s claim for condoning the delay based on retrospective application of the right of appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 23:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421966" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1070 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325886</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal challenging the Tribunal&#039;s order of dismissal based on limitation, citing that the subsequent right of appeal introduced in 2015 cannot retroactively create a substantive right to appeal against orders issued in 2008 when no statutory appeal remedy existed. The appellant&#039;s request for condonation of delay was denied, emphasizing that the right of appeal is a procedural matter that cannot be applied retrospectively to orders issued before the statutory remedy was available. The court found no substantial question of law and rejected the appellant&#039;s claim for condoning the delay based on retrospective application of the right of appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325886</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>