<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1065 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325881</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the treatment of the refundable security deposit, holding that such deposits should be excluded from taxable income. However, the disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act was upheld against the assessee. Consequently, the assessee&#039;s appeal for AY 2011-12 and AY 2012-13 was partly allowed, while the Revenue&#039;s appeals for the same assessment years were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 10:41:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1065 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325881</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the treatment of the refundable security deposit, holding that such deposits should be excluded from taxable income. However, the disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act was upheld against the assessee. Consequently, the assessee&#039;s appeal for AY 2011-12 and AY 2012-13 was partly allowed, while the Revenue&#039;s appeals for the same assessment years were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325881</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>