<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1054 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325870</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the reopening of the assessment under section 147 read with section 148 of the Act, ruling it as bad in law due to the absence of failure on the part of the assessee to disclose material facts. Consequently, the revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s cross objections were allowed. The Tribunal did not further examine the case&#039;s merits as the reassessment proceedings were already annulled. The decision was rendered on 20.01.2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 10:41:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421950" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1054 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325870</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the reopening of the assessment under section 147 read with section 148 of the Act, ruling it as bad in law due to the absence of failure on the part of the assessee to disclose material facts. Consequently, the revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s cross objections were allowed. The Tribunal did not further examine the case&#039;s merits as the reassessment proceedings were already annulled. The decision was rendered on 20.01.2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325870</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>