https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325868 The Tribunal rejected the appellant's refund claim for service tax paid on immovable property during a specific period, citing retrospective taxation amendments and the High Court of Bombay's validation of the amendment's constitutionality. The appellant's argument that service tax liability did not apply to renting of immovable property was dismissed, emphasizing the legal validity of the government's notification taxing such services. The Tribunal found the appeals lacking merit and upheld the impugned orders, highlighting the influence of legislative changes and judicial decisions on tax liabilities concerning immovable property services. en-us Thu, 28 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Oct 2016 17:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325868 The Tribunal rejected the appellant's refund claim for service tax paid on immovable property during a specific period, citing retrospective taxation amendments and the High Court of Bombay's validation of the amendment's constitutionality. The appellant's argument that service tax liability did not apply to renting of immovable property was dismissed, emphasizing the legal validity of the government's notification taxing such services. The Tribunal found the appeals lacking merit and upheld the impugned orders, highlighting the influence of legislative changes and judicial decisions on tax liabilities concerning immovable property services. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 28 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325868