<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 1122 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180646</link>
    <description>A revised assessment order cannot be sustained when an assessee has specifically sought a personal hearing and the authority passes an adverse order without affording it. Applying the settled requirement of audi alteram partem, the Madras HC set aside the assessment for denial of hearing and remitted the matter for fresh consideration after hearing the petitioner. The merits of the declaration forms and reassessment were left open to the authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 10:39:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 1122 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180646</link>
      <description>A revised assessment order cannot be sustained when an assessee has specifically sought a personal hearing and the authority passes an adverse order without affording it. Applying the settled requirement of audi alteram partem, the Madras HC set aside the assessment for denial of hearing and remitted the matter for fresh consideration after hearing the petitioner. The merits of the declaration forms and reassessment were left open to the authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>