<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (6) TMI 951 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180647</link>
    <description>A fiscal amnesty scheme under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act required strict compliance, and an assessee who failed to maintain sufficient funds to honour cheques issued under the scheme could not insist on continued benefits or demand notice before the benefit ended. The court treated the scheme as a settlement of arrears as a whole, not a piecemeal arrangement for individual assessment years, and held that the assessee&#039;s own default brought the amnesty to an end. It also held that appropriation of amounts collected under the statutory provision governing allocation of receipts could not be challenged merely because the assessee preferred a different adjustment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 10:39:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (6) TMI 951 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180647</link>
      <description>A fiscal amnesty scheme under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act required strict compliance, and an assessee who failed to maintain sufficient funds to honour cheques issued under the scheme could not insist on continued benefits or demand notice before the benefit ended. The court treated the scheme as a settlement of arrears as a whole, not a piecemeal arrangement for individual assessment years, and held that the assessee&#039;s own default brought the amnesty to an end. It also held that appropriation of amounts collected under the statutory provision governing allocation of receipts could not be challenged merely because the assessee preferred a different adjustment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180647</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>