<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 1021 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180653</link>
    <description>The exemption for &quot;all kinds of sports and games&quot; under the Rajasthan Entertainments and Advertisements Tax Act was construed strictly, and coverage had to be clearly established by the claimant. Applying the common parlance meaning of &quot;games&quot; and &quot;sports,&quot; video games and video game parlours were held not to fall within that exempted entry. The clarification dated 23.10.2004 was treated as an explanation of the existing scope of the exemption, and its exclusion of video games was upheld. The assessment and appellate orders were found legally sound, and no interference was warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 10:39:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421938" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 1021 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180653</link>
      <description>The exemption for &quot;all kinds of sports and games&quot; under the Rajasthan Entertainments and Advertisements Tax Act was construed strictly, and coverage had to be clearly established by the claimant. Applying the common parlance meaning of &quot;games&quot; and &quot;sports,&quot; video games and video game parlours were held not to fall within that exempted entry. The clarification dated 23.10.2004 was treated as an explanation of the existing scope of the exemption, and its exclusion of video games was upheld. The assessment and appellate orders were found legally sound, and no interference was warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180653</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>