<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 1048 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180639</link>
    <description>Entertainment tax could validly be imposed on direct-to-home broadcasting services where the taxable subject was the entertainment provided through DTH signals. The amended Rajasthan scheme, including section 4AAA and the connected rules and notification, brought DTH services within the levy, and the Court treated this as falling within State legislative competence under entry 62 of List II rather than the Central fields governing broadcasting or telecommunication. Relying on existing precedent and prior failed challenges by DTH service providers, the Court found no constitutional infirmity and upheld the levy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 10:39:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 1048 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180639</link>
      <description>Entertainment tax could validly be imposed on direct-to-home broadcasting services where the taxable subject was the entertainment provided through DTH signals. The amended Rajasthan scheme, including section 4AAA and the connected rules and notification, brought DTH services within the levy, and the Court treated this as falling within State legislative competence under entry 62 of List II rather than the Central fields governing broadcasting or telecommunication. Relying on existing precedent and prior failed challenges by DTH service providers, the Court found no constitutional infirmity and upheld the levy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180639</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>