<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (12) TMI 1218 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180641</link>
    <description>Writ jurisdiction was held available despite an alternate statutory remedy where the reassessment order allegedly failed to consider the dealer&#039;s objections and supporting material. The Court treated non-consideration of the manufacturing process, the nature of the goods, and the relevant documents as a breach of natural justice and held that relegating the petitioner to the statutory remedy was unwarranted. It also noted unexplained delay in completing the reassessment as contrary to the requirement of reasonable dispatch. The impugned assessment was set aside and remitted to the assessing authority for fresh consideration after hearing the petitioner and examining the record.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 10:39:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421923" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (12) TMI 1218 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180641</link>
      <description>Writ jurisdiction was held available despite an alternate statutory remedy where the reassessment order allegedly failed to consider the dealer&#039;s objections and supporting material. The Court treated non-consideration of the manufacturing process, the nature of the goods, and the relevant documents as a breach of natural justice and held that relegating the petitioner to the statutory remedy was unwarranted. It also noted unexplained delay in completing the reassessment as contrary to the requirement of reasonable dispatch. The impugned assessment was set aside and remitted to the assessing authority for fresh consideration after hearing the petitioner and examining the record.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180641</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>