https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180667 The Bench ruled in favor of the applicant in the case involving service tax liability on construction services prior to 1-7-2010. The demand for services rendered before 1-7-2010 was dropped, and the applicant was granted the benefit of cum-tax value. The Settlement Commission was deemed to have jurisdiction over the issue, and the applicant received partial immunity from penalties. The total tax liability was settled at Rs. 88,45,406, with a penalty of Rs. 6,00,000 imposed. The applicant was granted immunity from prosecution and ordered a refund of excess payment. en-us Tue, 30 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 31 Mar 2016 10:39:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180667 The Bench ruled in favor of the applicant in the case involving service tax liability on construction services prior to 1-7-2010. The demand for services rendered before 1-7-2010 was dropped, and the applicant was granted the benefit of cum-tax value. The Settlement Commission was deemed to have jurisdiction over the issue, and the applicant received partial immunity from penalties. The total tax liability was settled at Rs. 88,45,406, with a penalty of Rs. 6,00,000 imposed. The applicant was granted immunity from prosecution and ordered a refund of excess payment. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 30 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180667