<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 1057 - COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS), MYSORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180668</link>
    <description>The Impugned Order was quashed and set aside as it exceeded the scope of the Show Cause Notices, violating natural justice principles. The demand for service tax was found untenable as the commission received from mutual fund companies should have been discharged by the mutual fund companies themselves. As there was no duty liability on the appellant, no interest or penalties were payable. The appellant&#039;s commission from mutual funds should have been considered under Business Auxiliary Services, and they were eligible for a refund of the service tax amount paid. The appeal succeeded, and relief was granted to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 10:39:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421913" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 1057 - COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS), MYSORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180668</link>
      <description>The Impugned Order was quashed and set aside as it exceeded the scope of the Show Cause Notices, violating natural justice principles. The demand for service tax was found untenable as the commission received from mutual fund companies should have been discharged by the mutual fund companies themselves. As there was no duty liability on the appellant, no interest or penalties were payable. The appellant&#039;s commission from mutual funds should have been considered under Business Auxiliary Services, and they were eligible for a refund of the service tax amount paid. The appeal succeeded, and relief was granted to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>