<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (7) TMI 146 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2837</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand on industrial valves cleared without payment by job workers, imposing penalties on them. It confirmed the confiscation of non-duty paid valves and the redemption requirement. The appeal by the appellant firm and its proprietor against the original authority&#039;s order was partly allowed, with the penalty on the proprietor set aside. The Tribunal emphasized that duty payment obligations rested with the job workers, directing any refund claims to be processed according to the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42190" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (7) TMI 146 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2837</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand on industrial valves cleared without payment by job workers, imposing penalties on them. It confirmed the confiscation of non-duty paid valves and the redemption requirement. The appeal by the appellant firm and its proprietor against the original authority&#039;s order was partly allowed, with the penalty on the proprietor set aside. The Tribunal emphasized that duty payment obligations rested with the job workers, directing any refund claims to be processed according to the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2837</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>