<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1028 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325844</link>
    <description>Reduction of share capital may be sanctioned where the company&#039;s articles authorise it, the special resolution is approved by the requisite majority, and the proposal does not unfairly prejudice shareholders. Here, the company had been revived after liquidation under a restructuring scheme, the earlier preferential allotment was found lawful, and the public shareholding had been diluted to 5.47% of paid-up capital. The court accepted that the public shareholders were to receive a value well above the then-prevailing per-share value and that the resolution had overwhelming support. The proposed cancellation of public shareholders&#039; holdings was therefore approved and the minute was permitted to be registered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 10:23:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421891" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1028 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325844</link>
      <description>Reduction of share capital may be sanctioned where the company&#039;s articles authorise it, the special resolution is approved by the requisite majority, and the proposal does not unfairly prejudice shareholders. Here, the company had been revived after liquidation under a restructuring scheme, the earlier preferential allotment was found lawful, and the public shareholding had been diluted to 5.47% of paid-up capital. The court accepted that the public shareholders were to receive a value well above the then-prevailing per-share value and that the resolution had overwhelming support. The proposed cancellation of public shareholders&#039; holdings was therefore approved and the minute was permitted to be registered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325844</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>