https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2836 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in the appeal against the suspension of their CHA Licence. It found discrepancies in the impugned order, noting that no incriminating evidence was presented against the appellant for alleged mis-declaration. The Tribunal held that the appellant had not violated CHALR, 2004 regulations and dismissed the Commissioner's accusations of aiding and abetting fraudulent activities. The appeal was allowed, and the suspension of the licence was set aside with consequential relief granted to the appellant. en-us Thu, 20 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2836 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in the appeal against the suspension of their CHA Licence. It found discrepancies in the impugned order, noting that no incriminating evidence was presented against the appellant for alleged mis-declaration. The Tribunal held that the appellant had not violated CHALR, 2004 regulations and dismissed the Commissioner's accusations of aiding and abetting fraudulent activities. The appeal was allowed, and the suspension of the licence was set aside with consequential relief granted to the appellant. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 20 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2836