<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 1013 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180626</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in the cases of Shri Alkesh M. Patel, Shri Gaurang P. Patel, and Shri Praful G. Patel, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals. The additions of undisclosed income were deleted as the amounts were either already disclosed or meant for business expenses. Additionally, the Tribunal confirmed the correct invocation of jurisdiction under section 153C of the I.T. Act, rejecting the cross-objections raised by the assessees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 17:53:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421869" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 1013 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180626</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in the cases of Shri Alkesh M. Patel, Shri Gaurang P. Patel, and Shri Praful G. Patel, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals. The additions of undisclosed income were deleted as the amounts were either already disclosed or meant for business expenses. Additionally, the Tribunal confirmed the correct invocation of jurisdiction under section 153C of the I.T. Act, rejecting the cross-objections raised by the assessees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180626</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>