<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1959 (12) TMI 44 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180621</link>
    <description>Compensation for cancellation of liquor contracts is capital in nature where the contracts form part of the profit-making apparatus rather than ordinary trading stock. The receipt is treated as capital when termination destroys or sterilises a fixed capital asset or the business apparatus itself; it is revenue only where compensation replaces trading profits from contracts entered into in the ordinary course of trade. Applying that distinction, the liquor contracts were the means of carrying on the business, and their cancellation affected the capital structure rather than generating trading income. The amount was therefore a capital receipt and not taxable as revenue income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 17:22:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1959 (12) TMI 44 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180621</link>
      <description>Compensation for cancellation of liquor contracts is capital in nature where the contracts form part of the profit-making apparatus rather than ordinary trading stock. The receipt is treated as capital when termination destroys or sterilises a fixed capital asset or the business apparatus itself; it is revenue only where compensation replaces trading profits from contracts entered into in the ordinary course of trade. Applying that distinction, the liquor contracts were the means of carrying on the business, and their cancellation affected the capital structure rather than generating trading income. The amount was therefore a capital receipt and not taxable as revenue income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180621</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>