https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180620 Supervisory employees may fall outside the statutory definition of workman when they perform supervisory duties and their wages exceed the prescribed limit; the exclusion applies once the limit is crossed. Industrial disputes cannot be maintained for supervisory staff merely on a direct and substantial interest theory unless the workmen have a real and immediate concern in the terms of employment. The need-based minimum wage formula was treated as a recommendatory benchmark, not a binding rule, and the tribunal's retention of the 80% coefficient was upheld. The tribunal's choice of the operative date for the award was also accepted as a discretionary determination made on judicial principles. en-us Fri, 23 Apr 1965 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Mar 2016 17:12:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180620 Supervisory employees may fall outside the statutory definition of workman when they perform supervisory duties and their wages exceed the prescribed limit; the exclusion applies once the limit is crossed. Industrial disputes cannot be maintained for supervisory staff merely on a direct and substantial interest theory unless the workmen have a real and immediate concern in the terms of employment. The need-based minimum wage formula was treated as a recommendatory benchmark, not a binding rule, and the tribunal's retention of the 80% coefficient was upheld. The tribunal's choice of the operative date for the award was also accepted as a discretionary determination made on judicial principles. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 23 Apr 1965 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180620