<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 672 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180613</link>
    <description>Income does not accrue where disputed power-purchase receipts remain unaccepted, contested, and subject to arbitration, because Accounting Standard 9 recognises revenue only when realisation is reasonably certain; the disputed differential energy charges and tax reimbursement claims were therefore not taxable for the year and the related additions were deleted. Reassessment under section 147 cannot be sustained merely on a short deduction of tax at source on dividend payments, since TDS shortfall is addressed under the TDS machinery and does not by itself establish escapement of income; the reopening and consequential demand were accordingly invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 15:58:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 672 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180613</link>
      <description>Income does not accrue where disputed power-purchase receipts remain unaccepted, contested, and subject to arbitration, because Accounting Standard 9 recognises revenue only when realisation is reasonably certain; the disputed differential energy charges and tax reimbursement claims were therefore not taxable for the year and the related additions were deleted. Reassessment under section 147 cannot be sustained merely on a short deduction of tax at source on dividend payments, since TDS shortfall is addressed under the TDS machinery and does not by itself establish escapement of income; the reopening and consequential demand were accordingly invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180613</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>