<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 1073 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180602</link>
    <description>The Gujarat HC ruled in favor of the petitioner, finding the slight delay in depositing the amount not fatal to cancel the contract. The petitioner was granted an interim order restraining the respondents from inviting fresh tenders until a specified date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 13:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 1073 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180602</link>
      <description>The Gujarat HC ruled in favor of the petitioner, finding the slight delay in depositing the amount not fatal to cancel the contract. The petitioner was granted an interim order restraining the respondents from inviting fresh tenders until a specified date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>