<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 927 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180599</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the penalty order invalid as the AO failed to provide specific findings on concealment of income or inaccurate particulars. Emphasizing the need for independent assessment in penalty proceedings, the Tribunal highlighted the distinction between penalty and assessment proceedings. The appeal was granted due to lack of proper justification and failure to provide a reasonable opportunity for the assessee to be heard before imposing the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 14:20:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421821" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 927 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180599</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the penalty order invalid as the AO failed to provide specific findings on concealment of income or inaccurate particulars. Emphasizing the need for independent assessment in penalty proceedings, the Tribunal highlighted the distinction between penalty and assessment proceedings. The appeal was granted due to lack of proper justification and failure to provide a reasonable opportunity for the assessee to be heard before imposing the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180599</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>