https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180598 The Court addressed the interpretation of a settlement agreement and the impact of interim orders on contract liability. It granted relief against the tendering process and termination of the contract but vacated the order later. The stay against fresh tendering was lifted for zones 1 and 2 but deferred for zones 3 and 4. The respondent suggested withdrawing the termination order to continue the contract. The Court allowed fresh tenders for zones 1 and 2, deferring a decision on zones 3 and 4. The matter was adjourned for further consideration. en-us Tue, 13 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Mar 2016 14:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180598 The Court addressed the interpretation of a settlement agreement and the impact of interim orders on contract liability. It granted relief against the tendering process and termination of the contract but vacated the order later. The stay against fresh tendering was lifted for zones 1 and 2 but deferred for zones 3 and 4. The respondent suggested withdrawing the termination order to continue the contract. The Court allowed fresh tenders for zones 1 and 2, deferring a decision on zones 3 and 4. The matter was adjourned for further consideration. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 13 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180598