<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (7) TMI 143 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2829</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the refund claim by the lower authorities, ruling that the buyers were not entitled to a refund of excess duty paid on goods purchased in auction from the Government Mint. The decision was based on the buyers&#039; awareness of the Mint&#039;s report during the show-cause stage, lack of prejudice due to non-confrontation of the report, and the seller&#039;s non-dispute of excise duty. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed on 26-7-07.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42182" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (7) TMI 143 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2829</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the refund claim by the lower authorities, ruling that the buyers were not entitled to a refund of excess duty paid on goods purchased in auction from the Government Mint. The decision was based on the buyers&#039; awareness of the Mint&#039;s report during the show-cause stage, lack of prejudice due to non-confrontation of the report, and the seller&#039;s non-dispute of excise duty. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed on 26-7-07.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2829</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>