<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Assessee-Firm Not Owner of Seized Document; Section 153C Assessment Validity Questioned Under Income Tax Act.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=28194</link>
    <description>Validity of assessment u/s 153C - real owner of the document seized - the presumption cast under provisions of section 132(4A) of the Act, comes into play. - even the provisions of section 292C(1) also provide the same. This presumption was not rebutted by the AO of the searched person - assessee-firm cannot be said to be the owner of the document seized. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:33:17 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:33:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421818" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Assessee-Firm Not Owner of Seized Document; Section 153C Assessment Validity Questioned Under Income Tax Act.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=28194</link>
      <description>Validity of assessment u/s 153C - real owner of the document seized - the presumption cast under provisions of section 132(4A) of the Act, comes into play. - even the provisions of section 292C(1) also provide the same. This presumption was not rebutted by the AO of the searched person - assessee-firm cannot be said to be the owner of the document seized. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:33:17 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=28194</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>