<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 1187 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180596</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner of Income-tax&#039;s order invoking provisions under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, finding the assessment order not erroneous or prejudicial to Revenue&#039;s interests. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the advance received was not deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) as it was a business transaction. The decision was based on the principle that for section 263 to apply, the order must be both erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue&#039;s interests, which was not the case here.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:26:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421816" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 1187 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180596</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner of Income-tax&#039;s order invoking provisions under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, finding the assessment order not erroneous or prejudicial to Revenue&#039;s interests. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the advance received was not deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) as it was a business transaction. The decision was based on the principle that for section 263 to apply, the order must be both erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue&#039;s interests, which was not the case here.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180596</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>