<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 1050 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180587</link>
    <description>Business connection and dependent agent permanent establishment in India were upheld on facts showing exclusive agency functions, contract negotiation, collection of revenue, common management and functional dependence. Where the Indian agent was remunerated at arm&#039;s length, no further profits were attributable to the permanent establishment in one appeal; in the connected appeal, attribution was remanded for fresh examination. Interest income on a simple loan was taxed at the treaty rate of 15% on gross basis as the treaty was more beneficial under section 90(2). Interest under section 234B was not sustained because the income was subject to tax deduction at source, leaving no advance tax liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 10:52:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421790" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 1050 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180587</link>
      <description>Business connection and dependent agent permanent establishment in India were upheld on facts showing exclusive agency functions, contract negotiation, collection of revenue, common management and functional dependence. Where the Indian agent was remunerated at arm&#039;s length, no further profits were attributable to the permanent establishment in one appeal; in the connected appeal, attribution was remanded for fresh examination. Interest income on a simple loan was taxed at the treaty rate of 15% on gross basis as the treaty was more beneficial under section 90(2). Interest under section 234B was not sustained because the income was subject to tax deduction at source, leaving no advance tax liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180587</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>