<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1090 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180577</link>
    <description>The Delhi High Court, in a judgment by Justice S.Muralidhar and Justice Vibhu Bakru, addressed the misuse of powers under Section 60 of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004. The court criticized the Commissioner&#039;s hasty decision to seal business premises solely for failure to produce documents, emphasizing the need for reasonable grounds to suspect tax evasion. It highlighted the importance of providing the petitioner with a chance to explain, cautioning against automatic presumptions of tax evasion. The court ordered the immediate de-sealing of the premises and directed the petitioner to comply with producing records, ensuring fair treatment and upholding legal procedures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 12:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1090 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180577</link>
      <description>The Delhi High Court, in a judgment by Justice S.Muralidhar and Justice Vibhu Bakru, addressed the misuse of powers under Section 60 of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004. The court criticized the Commissioner&#039;s hasty decision to seal business premises solely for failure to produce documents, emphasizing the need for reasonable grounds to suspect tax evasion. It highlighted the importance of providing the petitioner with a chance to explain, cautioning against automatic presumptions of tax evasion. The court ordered the immediate de-sealing of the premises and directed the petitioner to comply with producing records, ensuring fair treatment and upholding legal procedures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180577</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>