<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 1154 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180585</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s cross-objection. It held that the amount received from the group company did not qualify as deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act. Additionally, the disallowance under Section 14A was deemed unjustified due to the absence of recorded satisfaction by the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 10:25:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421778" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 1154 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180585</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s cross-objection. It held that the amount received from the group company did not qualify as deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act. Additionally, the disallowance under Section 14A was deemed unjustified due to the absence of recorded satisfaction by the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>