<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1020 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325836</link>
    <description>An STP unit treated as a 100% export oriented unit engaged in call centre operations was held eligible for deduction under sections 10A and 10B despite the absence of separate Board of Approval ratification, because approval through the designated STP mechanism and the Inter-Ministerial Standing Committee was sufficient where the substantive conditions were met. The claim was also not defeated by being made under the wrong section in the return, since that was only a technical error and the underlying eligibility was undisputed. The commentary states that deduction should not be denied to an otherwise eligible unit on such procedural grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 13:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421771" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1020 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325836</link>
      <description>An STP unit treated as a 100% export oriented unit engaged in call centre operations was held eligible for deduction under sections 10A and 10B despite the absence of separate Board of Approval ratification, because approval through the designated STP mechanism and the Inter-Ministerial Standing Committee was sufficient where the substantive conditions were met. The claim was also not defeated by being made under the wrong section in the return, since that was only a technical error and the underlying eligibility was undisputed. The commentary states that deduction should not be denied to an otherwise eligible unit on such procedural grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325836</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>