<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 96 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2824</link>
    <description>Conditions attached to a deemed credit notification must be strictly complied with, and a declaration that omits the complete address of the godown or transporter where stock is kept does not satisfy the prescribed requirement; denial of deemed credit was therefore upheld. Penalty was not sustained because the levy on grey fabrics was newly introduced and the defective declaration, by itself, did not justify penal action; penalty was set aside. Interest on credit is chargeable only from the date of utilization, not merely from availment or entry, and since the credit was not utilized, no interest liability arose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42177" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 96 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2824</link>
      <description>Conditions attached to a deemed credit notification must be strictly complied with, and a declaration that omits the complete address of the godown or transporter where stock is kept does not satisfy the prescribed requirement; denial of deemed credit was therefore upheld. Penalty was not sustained because the levy on grey fabrics was newly introduced and the defective declaration, by itself, did not justify penal action; penalty was set aside. Interest on credit is chargeable only from the date of utilization, not merely from availment or entry, and since the credit was not utilized, no interest liability arose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2824</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>