<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1012 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325828</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the income received by the assessee from M/s. Resonance should be classified as professional receipts, not salary, as the relationship was that of a consultant and principal, not employer and employee. Consequently, the assessee was allowed to claim the expenses related to earning professional income. The rejection of expenses without proper examination of the books was deemed unjustified, and the appeal was decided in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 12:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421763" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1012 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325828</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the income received by the assessee from M/s. Resonance should be classified as professional receipts, not salary, as the relationship was that of a consultant and principal, not employer and employee. Consequently, the assessee was allowed to claim the expenses related to earning professional income. The rejection of expenses without proper examination of the books was deemed unjustified, and the appeal was decided in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325828</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>