<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1011 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325827</link>
    <description>Section 263 revision requires the assessment order to be both erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. On the advertisement expenses issue, the Tribunal noted that the assessment had examined the record, part of the expenditure related to printed material outside TDS requirements, and the remaining item was supported by evidence of tax payment by the recipient; revision was therefore not sustainable. On the fixed-deposit interest issue, the alleged understatement was reconciled by the assessee and not established on the material before the Tribunal; revision was again not sustainable. The revisionary order was set aside and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 10:10:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421762" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1011 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325827</link>
      <description>Section 263 revision requires the assessment order to be both erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. On the advertisement expenses issue, the Tribunal noted that the assessment had examined the record, part of the expenditure related to printed material outside TDS requirements, and the remaining item was supported by evidence of tax payment by the recipient; revision was therefore not sustainable. On the fixed-deposit interest issue, the alleged understatement was reconciled by the assessee and not established on the material before the Tribunal; revision was again not sustainable. The revisionary order was set aside and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325827</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>