<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1002 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325818</link>
    <description>The High Court partially allowed the petition, directing the Corporation to recalculate rental charges for zones 3 and 4 based on agreed rates, including service tax. The Corporation was instructed to retain the adjusted amount from the security deposit and release the remainder to the petitioner. No fresh computation of liability was needed for zones 1 and 2, except for any unpaid amounts due to dishonored cheques or similar reasons.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 10:09:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421753" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1002 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325818</link>
      <description>The High Court partially allowed the petition, directing the Corporation to recalculate rental charges for zones 3 and 4 based on agreed rates, including service tax. The Corporation was instructed to retain the adjusted amount from the security deposit and release the remainder to the petitioner. No fresh computation of liability was needed for zones 1 and 2, except for any unpaid amounts due to dishonored cheques or similar reasons.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325818</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>