<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 189 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2822</link>
    <description>Imported hard disk drives assembled in array form remained covered by Notification No. 6/2006-C.E. because the exemption applied to goods under Heading 847170 and the notification did not distinguish between the relevant sub-classifications. The Revenue&#039;s attempt to treat the goods as falling under a residuary classification failed, as the goods were accepted as hard disk drives and the notification contained no exclusion for array form imports. The lower appellate authority&#039;s classification was therefore upheld, and the exemption benefit was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42175" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 189 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2822</link>
      <description>Imported hard disk drives assembled in array form remained covered by Notification No. 6/2006-C.E. because the exemption applied to goods under Heading 847170 and the notification did not distinguish between the relevant sub-classifications. The Revenue&#039;s attempt to treat the goods as falling under a residuary classification failed, as the goods were accepted as hard disk drives and the notification contained no exclusion for array form imports. The lower appellate authority&#039;s classification was therefore upheld, and the exemption benefit was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>