<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 991 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325807</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the confirmation of demand on issues related to rough chits, cancelled invoices, and Oxygen gases prior to March 2003. The penalty under section 11AC was upheld for confirmed undisputed liability, with the appellant allowed to discharge 25% of the penalty under specified conditions. The redemption fine was reduced, and the impugned order was modified accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2016 14:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421742" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 991 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325807</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the confirmation of demand on issues related to rough chits, cancelled invoices, and Oxygen gases prior to March 2003. The penalty under section 11AC was upheld for confirmed undisputed liability, with the appellant allowed to discharge 25% of the penalty under specified conditions. The redemption fine was reduced, and the impugned order was modified accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325807</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>