<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 187 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2820</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order in favor of the respondents in a dispute over a refund claim for excess duty paid on old stock of blades. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected as the Tribunal found that the respondents had protested the duty payment from the outset, and the printed MRP on the packs prevented unjust enrichment, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s challenge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42173" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 187 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2820</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order in favor of the respondents in a dispute over a refund claim for excess duty paid on old stock of blades. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected as the Tribunal found that the respondents had protested the duty payment from the outset, and the printed MRP on the packs prevented unjust enrichment, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s challenge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2820</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>