https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2819 The Tribunal allowed all appeals of the appellants in a case involving the classification of micronutrients under Central Excise duty, duty liability on cleared Plantomycin, rejection of special discounts by the Commissioner, demand of interest on duty, and imposition of penalties on individuals. The Tribunal confirmed duty on Plantomycin but allowed abatement of discounts from the assessable value. It set aside the interest demanded by the Commissioner as inapplicable and concluded that penalties on individuals were unjustified due to no evidence of intentional duty evasion. The judgment was pronounced on 8-8-2007. en-us Wed, 08 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2819 The Tribunal allowed all appeals of the appellants in a case involving the classification of micronutrients under Central Excise duty, duty liability on cleared Plantomycin, rejection of special discounts by the Commissioner, demand of interest on duty, and imposition of penalties on individuals. The Tribunal confirmed duty on Plantomycin but allowed abatement of discounts from the assessable value. It set aside the interest demanded by the Commissioner as inapplicable and concluded that penalties on individuals were unjustified due to no evidence of intentional duty evasion. The judgment was pronounced on 8-8-2007. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 08 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2819