<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 983 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180568</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, upholding the validity of proceedings under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act. It determined that the provisions of Section 2(22)(e) were not applicable, rejecting the levy of interest under Section 234B. The issue of computing the current year&#039;s profit was not discussed due to the inapplicability of Section 2(22)(e).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 17:55:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421715" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 983 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180568</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, upholding the validity of proceedings under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act. It determined that the provisions of Section 2(22)(e) were not applicable, rejecting the levy of interest under Section 234B. The issue of computing the current year&#039;s profit was not discussed due to the inapplicability of Section 2(22)(e).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>