<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (1) TMI 254 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180566</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 271(1)(c) cannot be sustained where it is founded entirely on an assessment made by wrongly applying section 115JB to a foreign bank. The Tribunal noted the coordinate Bench view that section 115JB does not apply to foreign banks; once that statutory basis for the addition failed, the foundation for the related penalty also disappeared. On that reasoning, the penalty was held not sustainable and was directed to be deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 17:41:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421713" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (1) TMI 254 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180566</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 271(1)(c) cannot be sustained where it is founded entirely on an assessment made by wrongly applying section 115JB to a foreign bank. The Tribunal noted the coordinate Bench view that section 115JB does not apply to foreign banks; once that statutory basis for the addition failed, the foundation for the related penalty also disappeared. On that reasoning, the penalty was held not sustainable and was directed to be deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180566</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>