<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (8) TMI 1012 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180559</link>
    <description>The ITAT Pune Bench dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition related to sticky advances for the A.Y. 2007-08. The decision was based on precedents and rulings supporting the deletion of similar additions in cases with comparable facts, ultimately concluding the legal proceedings on August 31, 2012.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2018 12:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421702" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (8) TMI 1012 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180559</link>
      <description>The ITAT Pune Bench dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition related to sticky advances for the A.Y. 2007-08. The decision was based on precedents and rulings supporting the deletion of similar additions in cases with comparable facts, ultimately concluding the legal proceedings on August 31, 2012.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180559</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>