<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Overturns CIT Decision: Late Fee Payment Rectifies Non-Compliance u/s 264, Favoring Assessee.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=28170</link>
    <description>Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - Commissioner has rejected the revision petition u/s 264 on the ground of that the Petitioner did not comply with the mandatory requirement of payment of prescribed fees - the petitioner paid the requisite fee, though belatedly and thus cured the irregularity - order of CIT is not sustainable - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 12:42:56 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 12:42:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421660" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Overturns CIT Decision: Late Fee Payment Rectifies Non-Compliance u/s 264, Favoring Assessee.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=28170</link>
      <description>Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - Commissioner has rejected the revision petition u/s 264 on the ground of that the Petitioner did not comply with the mandatory requirement of payment of prescribed fees - the petitioner paid the requisite fee, though belatedly and thus cured the irregularity - order of CIT is not sustainable - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 12:42:56 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=28170</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>