<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1270 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180533</link>
    <description>The ITAT Pune allowed the appeal, directing the AO to delete the disallowance of the deduction claimed by the assessee for amortization of premium on Government Securities, contrary to the decisions of the CIT(A) and the AO. The ITAT Pune relied on a Bombay High Court decision and a previous Tribunal ruling in favor of the assessee&#039;s position, emphasizing the adherence to prudential norms prescribed by the RBI and legal entitlement to the deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 10:48:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1270 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180533</link>
      <description>The ITAT Pune allowed the appeal, directing the AO to delete the disallowance of the deduction claimed by the assessee for amortization of premium on Government Securities, contrary to the decisions of the CIT(A) and the AO. The ITAT Pune relied on a Bombay High Court decision and a previous Tribunal ruling in favor of the assessee&#039;s position, emphasizing the adherence to prudential norms prescribed by the RBI and legal entitlement to the deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180533</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>