<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 967 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325783</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act. It affirmed the Assessee&#039;s status as an Association of Persons (AOP) and ruled that Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) provisions under Section 194C were not applicable. The Tribunal stressed the principle of consistency in tax treatment, supporting the Assessee&#039;s historical revenue distribution method.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 10:46:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421629" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 967 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325783</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act. It affirmed the Assessee&#039;s status as an Association of Persons (AOP) and ruled that Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) provisions under Section 194C were not applicable. The Tribunal stressed the principle of consistency in tax treatment, supporting the Assessee&#039;s historical revenue distribution method.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>