<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 965 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325781</link>
    <description>The appeals challenging the additions under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act as deemed dividends were dismissed. The Tribunal upheld the orders of the CIT(A), confirming the additions made by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal found the decisions of the CIT(A) to be well-reasoned and justified based on the facts and circumstances of the cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 10:46:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421627" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 965 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325781</link>
      <description>The appeals challenging the additions under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act as deemed dividends were dismissed. The Tribunal upheld the orders of the CIT(A), confirming the additions made by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal found the decisions of the CIT(A) to be well-reasoned and justified based on the facts and circumstances of the cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>