<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (6) TMI 568 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180530</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the deduction of Rs. 7,17,000 under section 50(1)(iii) for the flat in New Bombay but dismissed the claim for the business loss of Rs. 1,42,720 as the assessee did not carry on any business during the relevant year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 10:34:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421610" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (6) TMI 568 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180530</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the deduction of Rs. 7,17,000 under section 50(1)(iii) for the flat in New Bombay but dismissed the claim for the business loss of Rs. 1,42,720 as the assessee did not carry on any business during the relevant year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=180530</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>