https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2807 The court held that a lawyer cannot be compelled to be cross-examined in departmental proceedings for filing argument notes as counsel for a client under Section 124 of the Customs Act. The court emphasized that an advocate's actions in representing a client should not subject them to cross-examination in such proceedings. The court quashed the order allowing cross-examination of the lawyer, highlighting that the advocate's submission of argument notes should not be a basis for action against the client. en-us Fri, 13 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Feb 2009 13:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2807 The court held that a lawyer cannot be compelled to be cross-examined in departmental proceedings for filing argument notes as counsel for a client under Section 124 of the Customs Act. The court emphasized that an advocate's actions in representing a client should not subject them to cross-examination in such proceedings. The court quashed the order allowing cross-examination of the lawyer, highlighting that the advocate's submission of argument notes should not be a basis for action against the client. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 13 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=2807