https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325756 Evidence of seizure witnesses, customs officials and the forensic report established interception of the truck, recovery of 116 packets of ganja from a concealed cavity, and the appellant's presence as driver. The charge had clearly put the accused on notice of alleged illegal possession of commercial quantity, so the misdescription of the conviction provision caused no prejudice to the defence. In these circumstances, the conviction could be treated under the correct narcotic statute clause while maintaining the sentence, and the appeal was rejected. en-us Mon, 25 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Mar 2016 10:29:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325756 Evidence of seizure witnesses, customs officials and the forensic report established interception of the truck, recovery of 116 packets of ganja from a concealed cavity, and the appellant's presence as driver. The charge had clearly put the accused on notice of alleged illegal possession of commercial quantity, so the misdescription of the conviction provision caused no prejudice to the defence. In these circumstances, the conviction could be treated under the correct narcotic statute clause while maintaining the sentence, and the appeal was rejected. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 25 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325756