<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 939 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325755</link>
    <description>The court affirmed that the refund claim for cost recovery charges was not maintainable as the appellant failed to appeal the demand. The court emphasized the necessity of challenging demands through statutory appeals and held that without such challenge, refund claims cannot be entertained. The court concluded that the assessment order remained valid due to the appellant&#039;s failure to appeal, resulting in the rejection of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2016 18:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=421598" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 939 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325755</link>
      <description>The court affirmed that the refund claim for cost recovery charges was not maintainable as the appellant failed to appeal the demand. The court emphasized the necessity of challenging demands through statutory appeals and held that without such challenge, refund claims cannot be entertained. The court concluded that the assessment order remained valid due to the appellant&#039;s failure to appeal, resulting in the rejection of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=325755</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>